I am a security researcher who is obsessed with understanding how systems actually work - and what becomes possible once that understanding is deep enough. Most people focus on vulnerabilities. I focus on the assumptions that make vulnerabilities possible. Every system is built on trust relationships, design decisions, operational processes, architectural constraints, and hidden assumptions. My work is understanding those assumptions, identifying where they fail, and turning that understanding into offensive advantage. --- Today, I lead the Offensive Cyber Division at one of Israel's largest and most complex healthcare organizations, applying this mindset to offensive research, adversary emulation, Red Team operations, and capability development at scale. --- The interesting part is understanding how a system behaves, what it depends on, where its boundaries actually are, and how those boundaries can be manipulated, bypassed, abused, or weaponized. I am particularly interested in attacker leverage. Not just finding weaknesses, but understanding how seemingly legitimate behaviors, trusted relationships, architectural decisions, and disconnected components can be combined into meaningful offensive advantage. That mindset drives everything from adversary emulation and offensive research to bespoke tooling, malware simulation environments, exploit development, and capability engineering. For me, offensive security has never been about collecting findings or producing reports. It is about gaining a level of understanding that allows you to predict behavior, challenge assumptions, and make systems do things they were never intended to do. --- The exploit is often the byproduct. Understanding creates the leverage. Leverage creates the impact.